Article Published by :
PAVAN KUMAR SHARMA,' PAAVAN &MAAHIR
DESTINY UNFOLDED
Chapter 3
Destiny - can it be predicted?
My experience is that if
there is anything like destiny then it is unfolding every moment. It unfolds
from moment to moment, second to second, minute to minute, hour to hour and day
to day. For an example recently three important events were planned for me, not
by me, but my department. I was communicated about my participation in these
three events only when I returned from my earned leave in second week of
July-14. The first event was the high profile Conference of Chief/Principal Chief
Commissioners of Income Tax at New Delhi on 21/22nd July, 2014 and
the second event was the Domestic Module of the Advanced Mid Career Training
Programme for Principal/Chief Commissioners of Income Tax at IIM, Ahmedabad
from 24th July 2014 to 09 August 2014. The third event planned, was the
International Module of the above stated training programme at Harvard Business
School, Boston, USA. When I joined after availing EL, I started preparing for
these three events as they seemed to be in my destiny.
I
prepared for them by first completing on priority my limitation tasks to be
completed before September -2014. So many works were to be completed on the
personal front also, and one by one I completed them. I had to reserve my road
and air journeys. I was to plan my stays, my visits during these stays, my
obligations official, family and social to be discharged. Moments passed,
minutes passed, hours passed, days passed and the first event which was the
Chief Commissioner Conference with the Finance Minister, happened exactly as it
had been planned by the department for me and my other colleagues and which was
executed by me, my associates and my
colleagues. So the first event which was destined had materialised without any
miss happening and as it was planned. But is it so certain that we plan for the
things and they happen as we or others for us have planed. I would say
certainly not. This element of uncertainty was on several accounts which can
not even be counted for certain. But inspite of ample number of uncertainties
attached with execution and happening of any event planned by us or by others
for us, thing do happen by and large in an ample number of happenings. So the
certainty of happening of any event planned by you is also very high. But that
doesn’t mean that you yourself or somebody acting on your behalf can make your
destiny.
The
uncertainty, even if one of it materialises can annul the entire certainty
attached to the happening of an event. As in my example my health was one of the
uncertainties attached to the happening of all the three events planned for me.
But it was so critical that if I would have fallen ill, I could not have
participated in all the three events or any one or two of them. My health’s
uncertainty was only an individual’s critical factor, but the Finance Minister’s
Health was the critical factor for the entirety of the happening of the first
event, i.e., the Chief/Principal Chief Commissioners of Income Tax conference
in Delhi as he was the person who was the Chief Guest of the Conference. So
uncertainties attached to the happening of an event are large in number, they
are across the board and they also are very critical. But still a large number
of events happen as they are planned or in a little bit deviated manner. So the
uncertain element of the future events is generally not intervening to prevent
the events from happening and somehow the world is pulling itself more or less
in a planned manner. A child is born, whether male or female attains youth,
middle age and finally the old age and death ultimately. Things being started,
developed, and finished before any of the uncertainties intervene to stop them
from happening.
But uncertainty still looms
large as even the life of an individual is uncertain at any given moment
throughout his life, and hence it’s not even possible to plan for anything at
all. So what should be the way out? One has to plan and do the work
irrespective of all the uncertainties and attempt to execute the plans also.
There is nothing wrong in this also. But one has to foresee the uncertainties
and vagaries attached to you the happening of the event. Also you have to plan
out to meet with the uncertainties and vagaries in a manner that even if they
materialise, they at least do not hamper the happening of the event and you are
also to met with your expectations. In management language it is called as ‘Contingent
Plan’ or the ‘Emergency Plan’. So in a way by having the contingency plans
ready to deal with possible uncertainties in happening of an event one can be
to an extent reasonably be assured about carrying out what he or someone else
has planned for him. Can anybody prepare a foolproof contingency plan? The
answer is no! because uncertainties are there also is the contingency plan
prepared, however perfect it may be. So you should have a supplementary
contingency plan, and there is no end to it. But if one makes out a strategy
for implementing the happening of any event then there are better chances or
probability of conclusion of that event without hassles. What is one required
to have a successful strategy is called as the farsightedness of seeing the
uncertainties attached to the happening of the event in the near and distant
future. This insight also is partially inherited and partially acquired. Skills
can be inherited but more than that skill can be acquired and developed.
Entrepreneurship is one such skill which can be developed by experience to deal
with so many contingencies of life.
The
highest of the uncertainty is in gambling. Rather one can say that the throwing
of dice is totally unpredictable. To see whether any planning can help in
playing of any gambling game, I went to a Casino in Goa. The owner of the
Casino had a dinner with me. I asked him as to whether one can play any
gambling game so as to earn and save money? He said yes one can do and the
question is that how much returns one expect from it. I was surprised to know,
so I asked what should be the basic principles to be ultimate winner in the gambling
games or at least not lose in them. What he told me, I am reproducing them as
under.
1.
The
first rule is that one should decide the quantum of money, in terms of
percentage of his total monetary availability which he can afford to lose
withhout being pained to even a little extent and just to have the pleasure of
playing the gamble.
2.
The
second rule is that when one invests in playing gamble one should determine as
to how much returns he is expecting from that investment. In general when one
invests in FDR he expects around 6-10 percent returns which are quite certain.
When one invests in equity/debt mutual funds he expects even higher returns of
around 15 to 20 percent but which is attached to only a reasonable certainty.
While investing in the stock market since the risk is more of the capital being
lost one expects even higher returns of from 30 to 50%. When one invests in
real estate the expectations are of an annual increase of around 50% even
though the risk of losing the capital is less, because the extent of investment
is very big. So once you have determined your capacity to lose the capital if
you want to determine the gains you expect from it then they should naturally
be lesser than the other high risk capital investments. It can reasonably be
fixed somewhere between what you expect from an FDR and what you expect from an
investment in equity. So it can be around 15 to 20%.
3.
With
this expectation of earning of around 15 to 20% you can devise ways to play the
gambling games. Certain golden rules to play these games are given as under:
I. Come with a quantum
of money to the game table which you are ready to lose. Out of this money you
segregate the money which is the limit till which you will lose and go
thereafter and leave the table. Be sure to leave the table immediately and
without fail upon exhausting that limit thinking that on the given day you are
not supported by the chance factor. Avoid to have a Gamblers Mind set.
II. Examine the game you
are playing and it’s to evolve a strategy by which you want to play the game.
One of the strategy is to play any game blindly and suits you if your strategy
is high risk strategy. But there are other strategies also which are not
totally blind. In them if the chances of winning huge sum are less than the
chances of losing a huge sum are also less. After risk/benefit analysis one can
device his own strategy of earning from gambling and can have strategies for
all kinds of the gambling games, which must be followed, as many persons are
doing for example in the stock market. Be a strategic player.
III. When the chance
favours you on a particular day and you are winning then also you should decide
your limit, where after you will stop your greed to win more and get up from
the table and stop to play any further. This requires a high order discipline
on your greed to have more, win more and test your luck or the chance factor bay
and limits. Law of averages starts working at some point of time in every
situation and no one knows when it will start operating against you. So be
careful and cautious even when the goddess of fortune appears to be smiling on
you.
IV. Most people believe
that certain numbers, certain days, certain times certain names, certain
combinations of numbers, bases on events is their lives are lucky for them.
Some are going to astrologists, taro card experts, saints and others to ask for
lucky numbers, lucky days, lucky periods etc., from them. These fellows play
the gamble in a prejudged manner and hence they come with a very high risk
profile of this way (win) or that way (loss). But since their risk profiles are
very high some of them win heavily and many others loose heavily. Studies have
revealed that the Casinos are running because of such high risk profile players
many of whom are the willing losers. So one should abstain from entering into
such a high risk profile, if he wants to achieve the target of earning 20 to
30% from gambling games. The profile should be reasonably risk oriented instead
of being high risk oriented.
V. Though gambling can
be one of the ways to earn some income, but it should never be the only way of
earning. This means that it should not be made the means of earning the
livelihood. As otherwise any failure in the gambling not only makes one
bankrupt but his family will also have to face poverty and destitution. So
gambling should not be played by the poor and those who are in the risk zone of
being bankrupt on account of gambling losses. Rule is do not gamble because you
need money, gamble only when you can afford the losses attached to the uncertainty
of gambling.
VI. Fishing in the
unknown seas is actually equivalent to fishing in the troubled waters. So if
you have mastered the playing of a particular game, one should not probe his/her
luck elsewhere. Because knowledge and the expertise in a particular game gives
one a strategic advantage, which should not be lost.
By following these rules one can minimize the
losses one incurs while gambling which is so full of uncertainties. But still
we cannot say that we can control the uncertainty even to more than a petty
extent. Till that ultimate uncertainty of death of living beings is unveiled,
no one can say that we have understood the phenomenon called as destiny, luck
or providence. In the spinning of a coin there are only two possible destinies
i.e., either head or tail but no one has devised a formula to determine whether
the result will be a head or a tail. When you toss it second time successively,
the combination of the possible results increases. Now it could be HH, TT, HT & TH. The thing is complicated
still further if the coin is tossed thrice. Now the possible combination of
results will be HHH, TTT, HHT, HTT HTH, THT, TTH etc., So larger the number of
spin of the coins, larger is the uncertainty of getting a particular set of
results. So the uncertainty looms large in a broader framework.
It is because of this
uncertainty attached to the future
events that every one desires to and tries to predict them with a reasonable
degree of certainty, Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Taro Card Reading,
Najumi are all the ways by which we try our destiny to be predicted. I have
personal knowledge of the principles and concepts of Astrology, Palmistry and
Numerology and I know for certain that all the three method suffers from many
inherent lacunae which are so glaring that if exposed, one will stop believing
in the predictions made through them. All the predictions to be made from the
popular predictive methods are based on empirical generalisations and long
standing personal observations of the persons who propounded these methods. So many
of the predictions made by these methods go haywire or awry.
But
the existence of luck cannot be denied.
As per genetics, one’s chances of coming into existence are probably a
few million to one. Given that your parents were born of many odds who somehow
managed to meet and hook up and produce you, it is even more of a miracle that
you exist. Indeed consider that our species should itself evolve and survive
through ages, on this one out of trillions of planets, and you get a true idea
of how remarkable your existence is. Don’t be under the illusion though that
this makes you special, everything around you is there despite similar odds
against it. However, unlikely it is for a specific something to exist, it is
inevitable that something will indeed be there. So congratulations as your
existence is only out of your good luck. While everything else pales into
insignificance beyond the spectacular fact of your existence, we are still not
satisfied. We spend our day striving for this or that trivial little things and
stressing over unimportant matters. We may be programmed to worry about little
things, we are again uniquely fortunate among species to be able to ignore our
programming. Honestly, just the fact that we are here should keep us in
constant state of elation and wonder. But we get tripped up by vanity. We
believe that we are special and that we possess the intelligence to make sense
of the world and to rule it. This vanity, in the cosmic scale of things, is
either comic or tragic depending on how seriously you take yourself. Take the
case of a serious Poker player, who did it to make money, ultimately ended up in
learning how little he knew about life. The most important thing one learns
from Poker is about the role of luck in the world. Poker is essentially a game
of skill, but only in the long run (which can be longer than what you
conceive). In the short run, luck dominates. Every action has associated
probabilities, and you try to manoeuvre your way through a Poker game in such a
way that the probabilities are on your side. Keep getting your money in as a 51
percent favourite and, in the long run, all the money is yours. In the short
run, you could get hammered again and again. For that reason, poker players are
constantly told not to be result oriented. In life too luck plays a far bigger
role than we realise. And as in Poker the management of that luck is the key
skill to learn. Luck plays a huge role in football, which is also a game of
probabilities. For example, Lionel Messi
scored
from a direct free kick 1 in 12.5 times. This is the bare number, over a
sufficiently significant sample size of free kicks. And yet we cheer madly when
he curls one in the goal, and groan and go “What is he doing” when he flips
over one way over - even though in larger scheme of things they are the same
shot. While fans and even most reporters
don’t get this, Managers do, working furiously to maximise the probabilities in
their favours. But fans go by results. Even in cricket every action on a field
has a number associated with it. A full delivery outside the off stump has X
percent chance of reverse swing into the batsman, Y percent chance of being
cover driven if it doesn’t and Z percent
chance of beating the field when that happens. Through a day as the overs go by,
thousands of events of different probabilities intersect as we get a result
that is determined partly by luck. And yet the people cheer in the slog overs
the shot that goes for six and boo the batsman holing out in deep with a
majestic lofted off drive. Therefore
chances can determine careers. Like
sport, life also consists of millions of intersecting events with varying
probabilities and Luck is a lead character in the drama of every person’s life.
The lesson here is not to sweat what we cannot control, to take nothing in our
lives for granted, and to make each moment count. And also to be humble,
because humility is the only appropriate response to the awesome complexity of
the world.
What
is this luck? Somebody told me that it is the third force which makes the
combination of two forces possible so that the event happens. Giving an example we can say that water
molecules are there in the rain clouds but still it’s not raining. Scientists
say that unless the molecules join together they will not precipitate as the
weight of one molecule of water is not enough to fall down and hence
individually all water molecules float in the shape of clouds. When two clouds collide or one cloud collides
with a hill, the collusive force generated leads to water molecules come
together and they then fall down in the shape of rain. So if this third force
is not operative rain will not be there, even though the clouds may be there in
abundance. This is why in some areas to cause rain seeding exercises are done
by spraying salt called silver nitrate among the clouds. Salt is very soluble
in water and once it dissolves in H2O the water molecules become
heavy by combining with AgNo3 and they immediately precipitate. In a simpler
situation in all the trading transactions the money is the force which
materialises the transactions.
Predicting
destiny is difficult only where these third forces are not known. Whether these
forces are worldly or heavenly is a matter of debate. Sometimes they are
clearly worldly and sometimes they appear to be very strange and many a times
out of the world and we may call them heavenly. For example death of some
persons is so accidental that even doctors fail to understand as to why they
died. The birth of a person is beyond the concept of prediction. Profit or loss
in any transactions however, is both predictable as well as unpredictable. It
has been therefore said by the author of Ram Charitmanas (Tulsidas) that “Loss,
profit, birth and death are the things along with fame or ill fame which are
only in the control of Providence”.
Destiny Unfolded
Chapter 4
Is Destiny Inherited ? Even if its so: Is it Fully Predictable ?
In the Star Wars movies there is a famous scene where Darth Vader says to Luke Skywalker “I am your father”. Luke screams “Noooo!” but he knows deep down that it is true. He was horrified even by this thought as he did not want any of Darth Vader’s genes. But now he realized that he does. These were the genes of hate and the genes of the dark side, so these were the genes of his destiny now. So is the evil in the genes inevitable? This is a big question.
There is a book on pastoral counseling called “Getting the Love You Want” a ‘Guide for Couples’ by Dr.Harville Hendrix. This book has a rather disturbing thesis; that the people often marry a spouse who embodies at least some of the negative characteristics of their own parents. For us even this is bad enough that as parents we have to worry about our children acquiring some of our own negative characteristics, but Dr.Hendrix, with a fair amount of research to back him, claims that our children are also likely to marry someone who embodies our negative characteristics. Hence you see a phenomenon that a child of an alcoholic will sometimes marry an alcoholic, children of controlling partner, if they do not become controlling themselves, will tend to marry a controlling person.
You might not be wondering why our children don’t ever inherit our good qualities or marry someone with them. Though the answer of this question is not negative as they do inherit our good qualities as well, but the bad qualities always seem to get passed on. This is in the way similar to the answer to the question that why is a classroom of children always more influenced by the one misbehaving child than by all those who are quietly co-operating. It’s like ‘sin’ is a virus. We never inflict people with health; it’s always with some or the other illness only. I am not saying that sin literally passed on through our genes but it might as well be. In other words, when sin came into the world through Adam and Eve, it did not affect just Adam and Eve. It got passed on from generation to generations. It became hereditary. Hence nearly all the human beings suffer from the seven sins of Ego, Jealousy, Hate, Lust, Greed, Anger and Attachment. So a family can bring the bad luck gene to you, whether it’s based on your Karma or just luck is a separate question. Luck is just like life. It is 90% attitude and 10% what happens. Some persons are inherently lucky whereas others are not so very lucky, by birth. George Mendel was the first person who dwelved in the area of genetic inheritance. He carried out experiments on the different traits like colour of flowers, size of pods, etc., to find out what traits are inherited and are dominant and what traits are though inherited they remained recessive. He proposed that there are two types of genes fro the each trait whether it is colour of flower, size of plant, size of pods and size/colour of the seeds. One gene is dominant and the other is recessive. The pair of genes is called ‘allelic genes’. Dominant gene is that which when present in a species reflects itself. Recessive genes manifest only when in a species the dominant allelic gene is absent.
Even before Mendel, the fact that a major part of predictable destiny is determined by inheritance was known to human beings and they were attempting to find out as how it happens. How the characters are transmitted from parents to offsprings. But before Mendel the belief was that the characters of the parents blended or got mixed during their transmission. The various theories were:
1) Moist Vapour Theory: In 580 to 500 BC, Pythagoras believed that each organ of the male produced moist vapours during coitus which formed the body parts of the embryo.
2) Fluid Theory: In 504 – 433 BC, Empedocles proposed that each body part produced a fluid. The fluids of different body parts of the two parents mixes up and is used in the formation of embryo. Any defect in the mixing up of the fluids results in missing of characters of one parent or both parents.
3) Reproductive Blood Theory: In 384 – 322 BC this theory proposed that the males produce highly purified reproductive blood containing the nutrients from all body parts. Females also produced reproductive blood but it is immature. The productivity of male blood was more than females and hence the male characters dominate.
4) Pre-formation Theory: In 1697 AD, Swammerdam gave the Pre-formation Theory in which a zygote is formed by mixing up of the male and female particles but later on it has to be fertilized by sperm to stimulate its growth. This theory was propagated by Malpighi (Homonuclus or Miniature Embryo believed to be present in the human sperm). By then the sperms were discovered by Leeuwenhoek in 1672. Wolff discarded this theory in 1890 and replaced it with Epigenesis suggesting that the organs are formed step by step.
5) Theory of Pangenesis: Maupertius (AD 1698 – 1757) considered that heredity is controlled by minute particles which come from all parts of the body to the reproductive organs. These particles combine in the Embryo. Certain particles of one parent dominate and hence one part of the offspring (say face) resembles with that parent and not with the other. Darwin (1868) modified it to propose that gemules and pangenes are the female and male particles which are passed on to the Zygote where they guide the growth of different parts of the Embryo to form an offspring.
There were many objections to these theories of Blending Inheritance. Some of them were –
a) The traits of male and female doesn’t blend in the unisexual organisms.
b) Children of dark and fair coloured parents are not of the intermediate colours. Some are dark, some are fair and some are of intermediate colour.
c) Many individuals show ancestral characters not found in immediate parents. This phenomenon is called as Atavism (great grandfather, grandfather or forefathers) Reversion or Throw Back. So characters may remain hidden in one generation but may appear in the next.
d) The cross breeding (hybrid) experiments showed that yellow and green seeded pea varieties breeded to yield hybrids which were all yellow seeded. When they were self pollinated, three types of offsprings were produced
i) yellow seeded
ii) green seeded, and
iii) both with yellow and green seeds
e) On repeated crossing of hybrids, their parental types appear in the offspring showing that hybrid contains traits of both parents.
By now it was clear that
- All the traits have alternate forms
- Traits are represented in individuals by discrete particulate entities which do not get blended or modified.
- One alternate of a trait may be exhibited more often than the other.
- One alternate of the same trait may remain hidden for one or more generations and can then manifest.
- Out of the two alternate forms of the trait, one is dominant and is express whereas the other is recessive and remains dormant.
Depending on them, Mendel in 1866 proposed that inheritance is controlled by paired germinal units or factors, now called as genes. They are present in all cells of the body and are transferred to the next generation through gametes. Factors or genes are the physical basis of heredity. They represent small segments of the chromosomes. Genes or factors are passed from one generation to the next or from one cell to its daughter cells as components of chromosomes (chromosomal basis of heredity). The genetic material present in the chromosomes is DNA. Genes are segments of DNA called cistrons. So DNA is the basis of heredity and it determine to the large extent the destiny of the offsprings of both the Plant and Animal Kingdom. Mendel was able to selectively cross pollinate pure bred plants with particular traits and observed the outcome over many generations. This was the basis of his conclusions about the nature of genetic inheritance. In cross pollinating plants that produce yellow or green pea seeds exclusively, Mendel found that the first offspring generation (F1) always had yellow seeds. However the next filial generation (F2) consistently had a 3:1 ratio of yellow to green. This 3:1 ratio occurs in later generations as well. Mendel concluded that this underlying regularity was the key to understanding the basic mechanisms of inheritance.
Cross pollination YY --- GG Parent generation (Homozygous)
ç
-------------------------
ç ç ç ç
Self Pollination YG YG YG YG F-1 generation (Heterozygous)
ç
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ç ç ç ç
Self YY YG YG GG F-2 generation
pollination ç ç \
ç ç ç \
-------------------- --------------------- -------------------- \ ----------------------
ç ç ç ç ç ç ç ç ç ç ç ç ç ç ç ç
YY YY YY YY YY YG YG GG YY YG YG GG GG GG GG GG
F-3 generation
Mendels observations from these experiments can be summarized in two principles:
1) The principle of segregation – For any particular trait, the pair of allels of each parent separate and only one allel passes from each parent on to any offspring. Which allele in the parents’ pair of alleles is inherited is a matter of chance (the uncertainty or the Third Factor/Force). This segregation occurs during the meotic division of the sex cell.
2) Principle of independent assortment – Different pairs of alleles are passed to offspring independent of each other. The result is that a new combination of genes present in neither parent is possible. For example, a pea plant’s inheritance of the ability to produce purple flowers instead of white ones doesn’t make it more likely that it will also inherit the ability to produce yellow pea seeds in contrast to green ones. Likewise, this principle explains why the human inheritance of a particular eye colour doesn’t increase or decrease the likelihood of having black hair or brown hair. We know the exact genetic reasons of independent assortment, i.e., the fact that the genes of independently assorted traits are located on different chromosomes. Mendel was the father of genetics as he disapproved Lamark’s theory of the inheritance of the acquired characteristics. So to the extent of the biological destiny of the individual human beings, we can say that in a major way it is predictable as well as certain or determined. Though it is not cent percent determined or certain because of the principles of segregation, independent assortment and now discovered genetic mutations which are both natural induced. So the chance or the luck factor/third force is still there to make it uncertain and hence not fully predictable. So we are back to square one - the predictable or certain part of destiny and the unpredictable or uncertain part of it. Though the genetic destiny is in a major part certain and predictable but it is also nearly almost uncertain and hence again depend on chance factor which is highly unpredictable. And we are still left with grappling of how to predict the unpredictable.
and
Pawan Kumar Sharma
Chief Commissioner of Income-tax,
Hubli (Karnataka)
This entry was posted on October 4, 2009 at 12:14 pm, and is filed under
. Follow any responses to this post through
RSS. You can
leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
April 8, 2020 at 8:48 PM
Excellent analysis of the two aspects of destiny.